Water's Thusness (Anderson)
Part of Ms. Luo’s question at the beginning of class on Tuesday really resonated with something I was also wondering about “Mountains and Waters Sutra”: is Dōgen subtly bringing us back around to an essentialist position of some kind—if in an entirely novel form—after Buddhism had done away with it, seemingly definitively? We know from reading Nāgārjuna that nothing possesses ‘ svabhava ’—the self-existence of a thing which both defines it and grounds its existence within itself. When we say that things are empty of self-existence, we are simply saying that the basis of their existence resides not in themselves, but in the causes and conditions that give rise to them, and because all things are dependently arisen, nothing at all possesses svabhava . I think what essences are—and why any Buddhist who accepts dependent origination must reject them—is clear enough. But there are a few moments in what we have read of Dōgen so far where he suggests something that, to my ear, sounds eeril...